Skip to content
JLJack LiewREN 83311 · IQI
Menu
Editorial illustration for OAKA vs Queenswoodz vs Vividz vs Park Green: Bukit Jalil comparison

Jack’s Bukit Jalil comparison · 2026

OAKA vs Queenswoodz vs Vividz vs Park Green: Bukit Jalil comparison

Compare OAKA, Queenswoodz, Vividz and Park Green: indicative prices, layouts, tenure, density and the practical compromises for Bukit Jalil buyers.

Direct answer

The short answer

These four Bukit Jalil projects do not target the same budget or household. Vividz has the lowest published indicative entry among this selection, while Park Green starts with larger homes and a higher commitment. OAKA and Park Green are freehold; Queenswoodz and Vividz are leasehold. Compare a named layout rather than the cheapest advertised unit. Pavilion access is not the same as an easy LRT walk, and neither establishes achievable rent.

Written from Jack Liew’s project observations and buyer-comparison experience, then structured and fact-checked against the published project information available for this website.

Read our property-review methodology

How to read this comparison

The recorded own-stay preference is separate from the factual table. Investment suitability still requires selected-unit pricing and rental evidence.

Quick decision comparison

Prices are public indicative references or explicitly labelled approved disclosure bands, not live unit quotations. Match the exact type before comparing affordability.

ProjectIndicative entry / tenureLayout rangeMain trade-off
OAKAFrom RM836,000 / freehold882-1,509 sq ft350 homes; entry two-bedroom layout is not the larger family type
QueenswoodzFrom RM723,300 / leasehold807-1,410 sq ft2+1 to four-room options; completion references conflict
VividzFrom RM446,400 / leasehold484-915 sq ftLower project entry; 1,138 homes and compact smallest type
Park GreenFrom RM1.2m / freehold1,201-1,905 sq ft453 homes; larger starting layout means a higher entry commitment
Visual guide

See the projects covered in this comparison

These are published project visuals, showroom references, scale models or floor plans. Use them to understand the product, then verify the selected unit, dimensions, finishes and current specifications in writing.

OAKA Residences Bukit Jalil
OAKA Residences Project marketing image. Confirm the approved plan and final specifications. View larger image
The Queenswoodz Bukit Jalil grand arrival artist impression
The Queenswoodz Bukit Jalil Project marketing image. Confirm the approved plan and final specifications. View larger image
The Vividz Bukit Jalil
The Vividz Project marketing image. Confirm the approved plan and final specifications. View larger image
Park Green Bukit Jalil
Park Green Project marketing image. Confirm the approved plan and final specifications. View larger image

Which project suits which buyer?

  • Consider OAKA if its freehold tenure and 350-home scale matter, and compare the study space with a true third bedroom.
  • Consider Queenswoodz if a selected larger layout fits your household; resolve the contractual completion date rather than choosing between conflicting public dates.
  • Consider Vividz if a compact unit is genuinely sufficient; do not use its entry price to budget for the 915 sq ft three-bedroom plan.
  • Consider Park Green if you want to start at 1,201 sq ft and the higher purchase and recurring costs remain comfortable.

Does mall access settle the transport question?

No. Park Green's Pavilion connection addresses a mall journey, not automatically the journey to a train platform. For each project, test the actual gate, crossings, shelter and destination interchange. Compare your regular journey at the time you travel, then price any remaining car dependence.

Buyer-fit analysis

Keep family space and the station route in separate columns

Do not let proximity to Pavilion answer the rail question. Record the exact exit, station entrance, crossings and weather protection for the selected building. No newly timed route inspection is added by this update.

For a family comparison, first choose the named plan that accommodates the household. Then compare its own written quotation and recurring charges. A project containing three-bedroom types does not make its smallest advertised unit a three-bedroom purchase.

Jack's recorded own-stay preference

Jack's existing comparison favours Queenswoodz for its combination of convenience and family layouts, while acknowledging leasehold tenure and higher density. This is a personal weighting, not a universal winner or evidence of superior rental returns. Apply it only if those priorities match yours.

Compare the current release

Help Me Choose a Bukit Jalil Project

Share your budget, preferred size and buying timeline. Jack will help you narrow the current choices before you visit a sales gallery.

Help Me Choose a Bukit Jalil Project

Compare the project details

Compare prices, layouts and everyday costs. Starting prices do not apply to every layout; open each project for the unit-type breakdown.

ProjectIndicative price / layoutsMaintenanceTransportCompletion / status
OAKA Residences From RM836,000
882-1,509 sq ft (developer-published full range)
2-3 bedrooms; additional study or utility space depends on the plan
Ask for the current charges See the project location guide Q1 2028
The Queenswoodz Bukit Jalil From RM723,300
807 - 1,410 sqft
2+1 - 4
Ask for the current charges See the project location guide July 2030 — official EXSIM brochure; confirm selected-unit SPA terms
The Vividz From RM446,400
Approx. 484 - 915 sq ft
1+1 - 3
Ask for the current charges See the project location guide Q3 2029
Park Green From RM1,200,000
Approx. 1,201 - 1,905 sq ft
3 - 4
Ask for the current charges See the project location guide March 2029 (official APDL target; actual delivery to confirm)

Distances are approximate. Target completion dates may change; confirm handover status and the selected unit's price before booking.

Explore the projects

Project guides behind this comparison

Open each complete project page for its facilities, layouts and published facts. This article explains where I see the practical differences.

OAKA Residences Bukit Jalil

Bukit Jalil

OAKA Residences

From RM836,000

Built-up
882–1,509 sq ft (developer-published full range)
Bedrooms
2–3 bedrooms; additional study or utility space depends on the plan
Tenure
Freehold
Property type
Condominium
View project →
Project-by-project review

Strengths, compromises and my view

The Queenswoodz Bukit Jalil Bukit Jalil
Jack’s preferred option

Queenswoodz: my balanced own-stay choice

What stands out
  • Convenient for Awan Besar LRT, Jalil Link, Pavilion Bukit Jalil and the recreational park.
  • Practical choices from compact family layouts to four-room and selected dual-key configurations.
  • EXSIM is an established developer name that many Bukit Jalil buyers already recognise.
  • Offers city convenience while retaining greenery around the wider Bukit Jalil setting.
What to inspect
  • Leasehold rather than freehold.
  • The 1,004-unit scale means buyers should expect a higher-density environment.
  • The shared and relatively narrow exit arrangement around Kingswoodz and Queenswoodz deserves a peak-hour site inspection.
Why buyers consider it
  • Family-sized layouts with practical choices from 2+1 rooms to four rooms.
  • Useful access to Awan Besar LRT, Pavilion Bukit Jalil, Jalil Link and the recreational park.
  • A balanced combination of daily convenience and greenery.
  • Flexible-room and selected dual-key configurations for changing household needs.
Suitable for
  • Families wanting a spacious, practical layout.
  • Buyers who prioritise LRT accessibility.
  • Couples planning for children.
  • Buyers who need a study or flexible extra room.
  • Owners considering a selected dual-key configuration.
  • Buyers comfortable with leasehold tenure and a higher-density environment.
I prefer Queenswoodz because it gives me the most balanced combination of convenience, useful family layouts and access to the places that make Bukit Jalil attractive. It is my own-stay choice if leasehold tenure and density are acceptable.
View complete The Queenswoodz Bukit Jalil page
OAKA Residences Bukit Jalil
Freehold and lower density

OAKA: quieter residential positioning

What stands out
  • Freehold residential condominium positioning.
  • Only 350 units, with approximately seven homes per floor in the saved project information.
  • Practical 882–1,423 sq ft layouts and two to three car parks depending on type.
  • A quieter, greener residential proposition with golf-course frontage and pet-friendly positioning.
What to inspect
  • The price per square foot may feel high when compared with more entry-focused Bukit Jalil projects.
  • It is not the most direct option for buyers whose priority is Pavilion Bukit Jalil or walking to rail.
Why buyers consider it
  • Freehold residential ownership.
  • A lower-density environment with only 350 residences.
  • Spacious layouts suited to family living.
  • A quieter residential setting away from the busiest commercial areas.
  • Pet-friendly positioning.
  • Golf-course frontage and greener views.
Suitable for
  • Family-home buyers.
  • Pet owners.
  • Buyers who prefer a lower-density development.
  • Buyers seeking freehold residential ownership.
  • Own-stay buyers who value a peaceful setting and golf-course views.
OAKA is worth considering when freehold tenure, lower density and a residential atmosphere matter more than direct mall or LRT convenience.
View complete OAKA Residences page
The Vividz Bukit Jalil
Jack’s investment comparison

Vividz: compact choices inside KL Wellness City

What stands out
  • One- to three-bedroom choices create more entry points for singles, couples and smaller households.
  • Located within the developing KL Wellness City precinct.
  • The smaller formats can produce a lower entry commitment than the larger family projects in this comparison.
  • Shuttle access to Pavilion Bukit Jalil and LRT is highlighted in the saved project material.
What to inspect
  • The 1,138-unit scale may create significant competition between similar investment units after completion.
  • Some buyers may be less comfortable living beside a hospital because of personal or cultural preferences.
  • I find the one- and two-bedroom proposition clearer; the three-bedroom layout and pricing should be compared carefully against larger alternatives.
Why buyers consider it
  • A lower entry-price position within this four-project comparison.
  • Smaller one- and two-bedroom choices for compact-home buyers.
  • Location within the developing KL Wellness City township.
  • Layouts that can suit an individual or a couple.
  • Potential appreciation tied to the wider township’s progress, subject to market conditions and competing supply.
Suitable for
  • First-home buyers.
  • Singles and couples.
  • Healthcare professionals.
  • Parents purchasing for a child studying nearby.
  • Investors seeking a lower entry price.
  • Buyers comfortable with leasehold tenure.
Vividz is my investment comparison because its compact layouts and wellness-township story create a clearer tenant angle. The actual result will still depend on entry price, furnishing, unit selection and future competing supply.
View complete The Vividz page
Park Green Bukit Jalil
Best location and layouts

Park Green: premium Pavilion-linked family living

What stands out
  • Private pedestrian bridge to Pavilion Bukit Jalil.
  • Large 1,201–1,905 sq ft family layouts, including a four-bedroom sky semi-D option.
  • Freehold tenure and only 453 residences in the saved project information.
  • Strong location for buyers who prioritise Pavilion, the recreational park and established Bukit Jalil amenities.
What to inspect
  • Premium price-per-square-foot positioning.
  • Rail access is not its strongest advantage, so it is better assessed as a mall-linked, car-oriented own-stay project.
  • The car-park circulation involves repeated turns; drivers should inspect the final access and circulation personally.
Why buyers consider it
  • Freehold tenure.
  • Direct pedestrian access to Pavilion Bukit Jalil.
  • Large, family-oriented layouts.
  • A lower-density scale of only 453 residences.
  • Approximately six or seven residences per floor.
  • Strong convenience for dining, shopping and daily services.
  • Premium own-stay positioning in an established Bukit Jalil location.
Suitable for
  • Premium family own-stay buyers.
  • Upgraders.
  • Buyers prioritising direct Pavilion access.
  • Families wanting larger layouts.
  • Buyers who value freehold ownership.
Park Green has the best location and layouts in this comparison for me. It is the premium choice, but buyers must be comfortable paying for the Pavilion connection, larger space and stronger own-stay positioning.
View complete Park Green page
Sources checked

Project facts and reference sources

Project references provide the factual basis and links to supporting material. Conditional buyer-fit guidance is editorial analysis; prices are not live unit quotations.

Personal project shortlist

Help Me Choose a Bukit Jalil Project

Share your budget, household requirement and the options you want to compare.

Your request is saved for Jack to follow up. You can continue on WhatsApp after submitting. A call or viewing time is confirmed personally.

Ask Jack